Better in what way?
1 Like
In the same way as cheap microwave power cable vs powerline ā¦ā¦
At the back end of last year I auditioned a Vertere MG-1. The dealer didnāt have the amplification I use (NAC252DR & NAP300DR) so put it into the new 222/250 combo instead.
Having read many glowing reports of this combo I was half expecting to want to change my amps and stick with my TT. I have to say though, I much prefer the 252/300. If you were happy with the sound back when you had that combo then you may still prefer it now.
1 Like
Not sure I understand. Is it just too cheap for your taste?
If you donāt believe that good cables have a cost, then we canāt understand each other.
1 Like
Put it this way Morgami 2972 outperforms NacA5 and WH Phantom by a significant margin in my 222/300/250 system at a fraction of the cost so for me thatās all that matters and therefore deserves the accolade of a āgood cableā. It is a 4 core cable however which might make it slightly more expensive than Morgami 2 core?
Perhaps because they hide some things that bother you, things that better cables reveal?
Or maybe they are the best cost effective cables in the world.
What I can relate is my own experience. I had 4 different speakers cables in the last 20 years. Each time the more expensive one was noticeably better. But I agree, the cost is not all. Sometimes less expensive sounds better than more.
But in the case of Mogami, they are particularly cheap. But can sound good for their cost, I donāt deny. But doubt strongly that they allow all the capabilities of such expensive gear as full 200 series.
In general itās advised to have the total cost of cables at 15% of the total system cost.
2 Likes
Cant say, I know it beats my old CDS3/252/300 set up by a margin (which is my only yardstick) whereby with other speaker cables previously mentioned, canāt say it did. Im not inclined to look further wrt speaker cables.
1 Like
This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.