Magico Speakers with Naim

From what people are saying, they are the magic pills :rofl: (hated them at an audio show, but I am convinced I should re-listen to them, even if they are out of my price range, as people like them so much).

What are these? I was referring to something else, so ?

Sorry for being cryptic. The Magico speakers are magic pills. But maybe I misunderstood your post (too much snow around here!).

1 Like

Yes, quite an hyperbole indeed! :smiley:

And it was meant as a bit of wordplay too: Stella, light-years…

But I think that one may have fallen flat :wink:

Joking aside, the Stella and the Maestro were actually the first speakers I crossed off my list.

Which is funny, because I was convinced they would be the perfect match for my Naim system.

But no, it just didn’t work for me.

That said, I completely understand why some people love them.

Magicos are very different.

They’re very much ā€œwhat you feed is what you getā€ speakers.

And as @Edmund-of-Essex pointed out, the engineering behind the cabinets is truly outstanding.

They’re not designed to be pretty.

The Magico M2 are basically designed to minimise vibration and diffraction, and to deliver truly exceptional dispersion.

The result is… well, you really have to hear them for yourself.

You see, I set out to buy Focals and ended up with Magicos, a brand I didn’t even know at the time. I had no preconceptions whatsoever.

So, does size matter!? :smiley:
Well… of course it does! :wink:
The right size, I’d say, is… let me think… Magico M7! :star_struck:

Cheers,
Thomas

Edit :

But if you’re after something a bit more ā€œsubstantialā€, without stepping into M6 or M7 pricing, a little bird tells me Magico may have a surprise lined up for spring :wink:

3 Likes

Trying to say, without seriousness, that Magico speakers become really magical if used with magic acoustic panels and magic pills .

1 Like

Hi FR,

No pills needed, just take oneself to The Bowl in ā€˜68 and get HIGH (on the atmosphere and the music) ……..

PS: Apologies for slight thread drift.

3 Likes

A lot of us here liked them enough to buy them, but that doesn’t mean you will like them or, especially, that you ā€œshouldā€ like them. People who end up with Magico want what Magico does. Not everyone will (or should!) want that. Taste+technology is what makes this hobby so fun and so varied!

4 Likes

Indeed. But you all are raving enough about them (and I trust your collective judgement enough) that IF I have an opportunity I will listen to them just for the heck of it and see what the fuss is all about, maybe next time I go to NYC to see my son. Out of my budget anyway (I think!).

2 Likes

well, bear in mind this is a thread mostly for people who share their common preference for Magico - like every other such speakers dedicated thread here (raving is common too, indeed!). So don’t lose your sleep before you have a chance to listen to them at a show or another demo.

5 Likes

My experience with magico speakers is they get better and better the more grunty the amplifier you use.
A 500dr would be the absolute minimum i would use, but really i would be looking elsewhere for an amplifier to really wake them up.

2 Likes

Hi Thomas,

I sense that we have much in common regarding our listening expectations of home audio. Nevertheless I thought I might provide an input which explores a slight difference of opinion……

They’re not designed to be pretty.

I personally think Magico loudspeakers are genuinely beautiful - even if the aesthetic is towards the ā€˜engineering’ presentation.

When I was choosing which Magico (S1 or S3) to purchase in 2019, I borrowed the colour samples box from the distributor. That was quite difficult but also fun, I even had neighbours (who are jewellery designers) come round to express an opinion.

The outcome was that I nearly chose the orange colour….. and then Magico launched the M2, so the colour choice was taken from mešŸ˜‚

3 Likes

Pretty like a fighter jet is pretty.

3 Likes

Hi @Edmund-of-Essex ,

I certainly didn’t mean to suggest that I don’t find Magico loudspeakers beautiful , quite the opposite.

Let me try to explain what I had in mind, although I’m no poet and english is far from being my everyday language.

A loudspeaker isn’t , or shouldn’t be, designed to be beautiful (IMO).

If you think about it, it’s simply a machine that converts electrical energy into mechanical energy.

By its very nature, its design is, or should be, linked to its goal.

And yet, more often than not, when the engineering is truly good, the resulting object ends up being beautiful.

When you think about it, that’s something rather mysterious.

There are plenty of examples.

Magico’s M series loudspeakers, of course.

The Naim Statement is another striking one.

A fighter jet, as @Middle mentioned.

A snail shell.

Or Euler’s identity, which left a lasting impression on me when I was in high school.

All of these share a kind of understated beauty that feels simple, universal and timeless (IMO).

Cheers,
Thomas

4 Likes

Speaking of functional beauty - or not - this weekend I am demo-ing the Gryphon Antileon Evo with my Magico A5s.

I will likely start a new thread about this amp. It’s the first high-bias Class A / massive current topology I’ve had in my system.

For the purposes of this thread: as good as the Magicos were when driven by my 250DR, it’s amazing to hear what they can do when they have ~infinite current to work with.

7 Likes

Enjoy, that’s gonna be a night and day comparison imho…..

1 Like

Thank you for reminding me of this LP.

It sounds wonderful emanating from my dibbles (which I did not have last time I listened to this recording) - the realism and presence of the double bass is quite extraordinary.

1 Like

Wow - that’s quite an advanced grade!

Can you say which route it was?

As a lifelong climber I am unfortunately on a months long break from climbing, due to (61 year old) finger problems.

The more uplifting prospect for me is that I’m going to attempt the circumambulation of Mt. Kailash in May. :nerd_face::musical_notes::speaker_low_volume::dragon_face:

3 Likes

Hi @SoundsOfMusic

Looks like I’m not the only climber on the forum! :smiley:

During the week, my time’s a bit tight, so I climb indoors.

It’s both enjoyable and efficient.

Outside, at the moment, it’s mainly ice climbing.

Enjoyable because climbing’s such a social sport, and efficient because in one evening you can climb ten pitches, which would be impossible outdoors.

At the moment I’m working on an 8a that’s about 13–15 metres long.

For me, that grade feels more demanding indoors than outdoors. First, because of the length : it’s three times shorter, so the difficulty is much more concentrated. And then there’s the ā€œpowerā€ aspect, which is pretty taxing. One needs to be in really good shape to climb that kind of steep overhang (I workout a bit, training to ā€œsupplementā€, at least twice a week).

When I climb outdoors, I usually go to the Valais (sport climbing) and the Mont Blanc Massif (trad and sometimes sport).

One route I’ve tried twice and dream of redpointing is ā€œDigital Crackā€ in the Mont Blanc Massif. Unfortunately, access isn’t straightforward. And I’d probably need quite a few more attempts, maybe in another life. I’m already 52… Below are a few photos.



Ah, hands… I’ve got the same problem. I’ve torn eight pulleys! :frowning:

Mount Kailash, now that’s some adventure! I imagine you’re heading off for several weeks. That’s a proper expedition! Post a few photos in a new thread when you get back!

Cheers,
Thomas

7 Likes

Reaching that chunky flake looks sparse - and then navigating that beautiful curving scarred and pitted groove! :disguised_face:

Nice.

Will update you in a new thread on the three week trip to Western Tibet (my fifth time in the Himalaya).

4 Likes