Mine was broken. Needed a repair but got a service in the process. Knew what it ought to sound like when it returned. Canât eay the difference was staggering but it was fairly obvious.
I have 2 nap200âs of about 12 yrs old. One is serviced, one is not. The difference is small to my ears. But, this depends of usage and a bit of luck I suppose.
Yes - with a 282/HC. The 250 gives a much more balanced sound - it resolves some of the harshness of the 200 and lowers the noise-floor. The music seems much more natural and flowing.
The most obvious difference Iâd say is that the 250DR has a much more meaty sound, with a lot more low end clout. The 200 has a lightness of touch that some find very appealing, and a few have said that itâs better to either stick with it, or jump all the way to a 300.
If you were to take a vote on it, though, I think most would say get the 250. Get a demo if you can.
Does that mean that you ought really to be looking at a source upgrade first? Downstream upgrades are only going to show up any shortcomings even more.
I wouldnât describe the 200 as muddy, maybe you need to look at your source/preamp/system setup?
OK, so a 250 should slot into your system nicely. I was just trying to think why you were getting a âmuddyâ sound, as thatâs not something I would associate with a 200.
Just relatively âmuddyâ as in wishing i could hear more âblackâ between the instruments and more dynamic range.
Suspect itâs often the recordings as i listen to quite a lot of âwall of soundâ indie rock type stuff. Something like Electric Ladyland sounds outstanding.
Same source as me and the 200 is beautifully balanced within that context and has been for 11 years. Itâs also not âmuddyâ so I think weâre talking service rather than upgrade.
282 + 200 is certainly no slouch I agree and itâs not a cheap upgrade to move to the 250.
If my 200 was as good as new again then Iâd be more than happy. It doesnât sound bad by any stretch and my use of the term âmuddyâ is strictly relative.
Always remember my dealer telling me that CDX2/XPS2 + 200/202/HC2/NAPSC was the best balanced Naim system of all the recommended options Naim ever produced and that while there was value in single box upgrades from that there was also a likelihood of ongoing dissatisfaction and upgraditos as you started to highlight weaknesses rather than strengths. 18 years down the line I think thereâs a fundamental truth in that which holds steady. Get your 200 serviced and see how you feel then.
Having tested variations over the years Iâd not swap the 200 for anything less than a 300 and my only planned upgrade is an NDX2 when my CDX2 dies.