But…
I must admit I think you could run output one of the 555 into input 1 of the NDS and use the NDS plug in socket 2
This would make the 555 a glorified XPS
I can think of no reason why anyone would do this?
If a used NDS and 250DR cost the same, which one would you pick ?
Please do not suggest upgrading PRE. That is not an option and have no interest in doing that at this point.
What are you presently driving the DAC with?
Do you have local stored music, or are you looking to start ripping your CDs
Are you setting a Roon environment?
Your choice, of course, but if sound quality is your priority, neglecting the preamp would be a mistake in my opinion, and will hold the rest of your system back. Your source is good enough to justify any of the higher level Naim preamps from 282 to 552.
So you can run Asset on the NAS and stream to the NDS through UPnP, which will be better then from a PC (will ignore the Toslink as is the worse digital connection).
This is then a path to a Roon environment, with a small Roon core & SonoreUPnP bridge to the NDS. This way to get support for all formats, better Tidal integration than Naim app, Qobuz support, MQA support (1st unfold) and the best UI to manage and explore your music.
Alternatively you could look at a Bridge product that has a good S/PDIF output into the DAC. However good ones are expensive, and DIY ones with RaspberryPI and add-on boards look ugly IMO.
I can recommend an NDS, which I use with a 555DR and the SonoreUPnP bridge as a Roon Enpoint.
However the DAC technology in the Naim DAC, the NDS and the ND555 is all based on the same technology & DAC chips. The ND555 uses a later SHARC device and a later Streamer board.
I did the reverse - I went from a NDS to NDac/555PSDR. Had the NDS for over 2 years but it just didn’t keep me engrossed with the music. Don’t miss the NDS at all. Very happy with the NDac/555PSDR.
What’s unhappy about it? I had exactly that for a while and I was very happy with it. I eventually upgraded to 282 (and beyond that later) but there was nothing about 202/HC/250 that I would call an unhappy combination. Certainly not optimal as the 282 upgrade later on brought huge gains and is better match for 250, but I enjoyed it quite a lot.
With that said, I would think upgrade to 282/200 has more benefit than 202/250. The 282 is rather special.
I asked about 250DR because there’s one available at a reasonable price, but unfor "Do you have a Hicap? If not, the 202 won’t work with a 250. " < I did not know this. I thought 202/NAPSC can work with 250DR directly, no ?