Agreed.
3 Likes
I have always though the UnitiQute offered exceptional value for money, both in terms of what it could do, and how it sounded.
8 Likes
For me, it was the NAT01 and 02, Nait CB and (!) HDX. It is so sad that there wasn‘t a HDX2.
3 Likes
I think it could have been the 42-110 pre-power combination, especially when paired LP12, Ittok with an Azak and Kans.
6 Likes
Pound for pound………
NAC-N 272
ATB, Dr J
4 Likes
You get a lot of pounds for your money with the Statement! 
3 Likes
In terms of money vs returns I’m going to have to say Atom HE.
6 Likes
I’ve had chrome bumper and olive boxes galore but nothing beats the Nova for value!
4 Likes
The biggest positive change for me was slotting in a 552. No other amp changes /combinations came close to what a 552 brought. Originally using a 250.2 and later a 500.Expensive ,yes ,but the 552 is the game changer.
As far as best for the money, Naca5 would be high on my list.
7 Likes
Hardly, that was a Chord product in the beginning, if memory serve.
Maybe your joking.
The suggested Unitiqute,…nah… thinking the Oled display issue, even I have one myself, splendid sound but too short display lifetime.
272 is pretty darn good two great things rolled into 1
7 Likes
What do you mean by saying that the lavender interconnect was a Chord product? It most certainly wasn’t.
1 Like
No it wasn’t, although the same source for the grey i/c was used by Naim as well as by Chord Cable co. for their Chrysalis.
I stand corrected then, same product made by Naim and also Chord.?
Pound for pound, the NAPSC on my Olive 202/200 many years ago. Followed by a Hi-Cap.
More recently, I guess the Power-Line for me.
4 Likes
I’m going left field and nominating the NDX2, as being the jewel in the crown for any streaming based system and value for money.
8 Likes
Other than the UQ2 at it’s debut price (what a machine!) I’d have to say the 72/140. Massive jump in performance. Incredible pre/power combo and it even fit one one shelf! Far closer to the 82/180 than it was to the 92/90.
4 Likes