Art Dudley wrote a review of my chrome bumper system (32.5/hicap/250) using his Quad ESL speakers and Garrard 301 turntable.
Here’s the link for those who are interested:
https://www.stereophile.com/content/listening-205-john-fahey-naim-nac-32-5-naim-nap-250-page-2
The premise of the review was to see what a vintage system is capable of when it gets restored to the absolute peak of its abilities by gurus like Chris West at AV Options, cost no object. Art reaches his own favorable conclusion in the context of his particular source/speakers, which I have never heard. In the context of my own source/speakers (Rega Apollo/Chord Qutest/SL interconnect and ATC HTS 7) the sound quality is stunning in absolute terms and the total cost of ownership is very favorable relative to brand new gear.
I originally put this system together because I got on an olive kick a few years ago, which turned into a chrome bumper kick. After cycling through ~25 Naim pieces, having some restored and some not, and hearing the impact of restoration as well as discovering the importance of synergy over simply going with the most expensive box I could afford in each part of the chain, I wanted to assemble a classic combination with proven synergy and max it out.
When I got on this kick I did not appreciate the importance of service/restoration. I assumed I would cobble together a 52/135 or 82/250 system on the cheap and that would be that. Well, I acquired a late 1990s olive 250 and after a while I couldn’t deny that it didn’t live up to the hype. I did not understand why people raved about the 250. I retreated to a 140, had it serviced to the max, and wow what an improvement (to my ears) over the 250. Fast forward past several other amps I tried to the fully restored chrome bumper 250 - it had an agility and groove that the unserviced olive 250 couldn’t come close to matching. Now I got why people loved the 250. I landed on the 32.5/hicap/250 system after leaning heavily on AV Options and old forum discussions for advice about which combination to assemble.
I think when buying vintage gear it is better to buy less “box” than you budgeted for, and invest the difference in a legitimate restoration. Between the cost of the gear itself, new SNAIC and DIN/XLR, and the cost of the restoration, I am probably in it for $6-7k, which is about the cost of buying a used 52/135 set, and less than buying a brand new 250 DR. I am fairly confident this system is better in almost every aspect than the average random unserviced 52/135 you could cobble together. There are probably unserviced 52/135 combos that sound better, but it’s in the hands of the stereo gods as to whether you get lucky with a good unit. You can’t tell just by looking at the pics in the listings. My olive 250 was immaculate but it was just not very good.
Also, I would stick to the tried and true combinations rather than venturing into mullet territory. The classic combos are classic for a reason. I would even try to maintain “purity” in terms of 100% olive or 100% chrome bumper. I had a fully restored 72 and did extensive A/B listening vs. the 32.5. The 72 is truly amazing and in a 1x1 matchup it’s the better preamp. It’s no accident there are three DBL systems I know of that use a 72. However, the 32.5 (at least to my ears) had a certain raw synergy with the CB hicap and 250 that the 72 lacked. Synergy is what gives you that last bit of magic from the music.
One thing in the review I would quibble with is the conclusion that the Naim/Quad combination is lousy at scale. I suspect that is down to the Quads. I ran the 32.5/hicap/250 on my old Allaes (my Dad has them now) and they would blow your hair back with a wall of sound. I had to switch to ATCs because we moved to a new house where the living room is not big enough to accommodate floor standers. I can’t use stand mounts because I have a 1 year old.
It’s remarkable that Naim made products like this that have stood the test of time in terms of sound quality, build quality, and aesthetics. Great credit also goes to AVO for their ability to restore the gear to better than factory new condition while preserving Julian’s vision for what music in the home should be capable of.
There is one other important conclusion from my journey, although it’s one that the review was not intended to address. There is absolutely nothing like a system with a Naim source, Naim amps and Naim speakers. I briefly ran the CB system with a CDX/XPS and Allaes before we moved.
The final frontier - if I ever have the space and the courage - is to get a pair of SL2s and go active with another CB 250. If music is the drug, a system like that might deliver the overdose!