not sure if I should mention my experience but here it goes
I have a HCDR on my 282, but in another room I have a 202/200DR, and I wondered how to get better sound out of this
so I tried the HCDR, yes very nice, but I opted instead to upgrade my source from a chord 2qute to a qutest and also added a Superlumina speaker cable. I got both on very good deals.
Was it worth it - yes absolutely.
Would I still get a HCDR… well I would rather upgrade the 202 to a 82 or upgrade my 282 to a 252 instead…. and free up the 282 to take the place of the 202.
I have a Nait 50, and auditioned a few 300 series in the last 3 months.
Despite everything I have heard, I like the sound of Chord Dacs and and upgrade downstream of that it nice to have but not mandatory. Having a source that I like is mandatory.
So adding XPSDR on NDAC or a Naim source that can accept one for me is much better for me than any preamp upgrade.
So sometimes I wonder if adding a 282 would be better or another Mscaler on my 202…. I would rather have the Mscaler.
About the Superlumina cables to me they are indispensable and mandatory also. for source interconnects one could use Vertere…. but speaker cables the capacitance of SL is much Lower….
two of the most mind blowing demos I have heard
- Nac 172/Nap 250.2/Dynaudio C2 speakers. Change from Chord Hugo to Chord Dave this was a massive upgrade, the Chord Dave made the Hugo sound broken and defective (even though it wasn’t). The NAC 172 was good enough to show the big upgrade from Hugo to Dave
- Chord Dave/Nap 500/Super Faber Stradivarius speakers with a NAC 282/HCDR against a NAC 552. Again - the 552 made the 282HCDR sound broken and defective (even though it wasn’t). In this case the 552 just allowed all the sources to sound at their best. The 282 just didn’t let all the sources even a chord Dave sound as good as they could. But the nac 552 is a very expensive proposition
What can I say - back in 2016 a Chord Dave was significantly cheaper than a NAC 552DR and I couldn’t get over the fact that I wanted the extra information and 3D soundstage of the Chord Dave’s as well and the midrange magic.
more information for the source to me seems to be a better solution despite the fact that the preamp may be not letting all of it going through.
A Dave has big massive 3 d soundstage. Much bigger than a Hugo and a preamp cannot turn a Hugo into a Dave
Source first won for me of far because it was lower cost - I am not sure about the latest Quartet Mscaler though (the price) so maybe next I would go for NAC52 as most cost effective. or maybe NAC 332 or maybe used NAC 552…
So far my decisions on the 202 are working out for me (the source and the SL speaker cable) - I am really enjoying the rock music which is what this is about for me.
too many choices and so little money. But still though my 202/200 DR always was superbly enjoyable all these years.