@davidhendon thanks for your measured and helpful post, which I know to be well intended and constructive.
This might be a generational thing. Born in 1945 I am of that vintage which has always looked to the NHS for my medical care and wellbeing, and through the working class background into which I was born the thought of private education was likewise outlandish and unthinkable for me and mine. The NHS and state education has served me well, and I am content. Not that I am in any way against people spending their money on any aspect of private care they can or want to afford, but that is not me. So the thought of paying thousands for hearing aids and private audiological advice is another country and will always remain so. I would not want to develop this further here and in response to any views to the contrary, for fear of transgressing against Richard’s iron rule against political discussion sullying these hallowed pages.
There is an inherent contradiction buried in here of course, in that I am evidently not averse to splurging income (or capital for that matter) on expensive, shiny, completely non-essential consumer goods. Except of course to say that the fact my modest income has allowed me to do that is intrinsically linked to the high standards of health care and education available from the public purse to which we all contribute.
To the thrust of your argument. That my speakers are largely not to blame because they are as good as they ever were but my new hearing aids are less than well adjusted or electronically competent than better aids in more expert hands might be. Its possible both of those are true, yet each of us in our different ways and outlook, and with different spending power available to us, will seek different solutions, and both of us could be right, whilst not being the same.
I’m now on at least my fourth set of hearing aids in approximately 20 years since my congenital hearing loss began to manifest. If I had been having to (or of course electing to) spend privately on hearing instruments costing into four figures, plus private consultations to support their use, I would still have my former Arcam separates with Castle Severn 2 speakers, and could never have lifted my (NHS corrected) weary old eyes to behold the blessed land of Naim.
The aids I had before these newest ones were not revealing to me the harshness of the treble on the PMCs which many other customers must have been hearing, else why has the manufacturer tweaked their output recently? I don’t want to swap my current ones for a sweeter version of the same when a wider range of choice is now before me of alternatives which, in consensus if not in my own individual judgment, are held to be sweeter sounding, wider ranging and yes, even better looking.
So I see this as a fortunate dilemma forced on me by a very good set of hearing aids, in fact the best I have had to date, which, when I am listening to other speakers with a sweeter top end, or in normal conversation, have restored some of my lost hearing from the past 3/4 years to a level better than it then was. Even to the extent that I can hear how harsh the PMCs are and how sweet they are.
Thank you for your insights, but having to tweak and update yet another app is not where I want to go. I envy you your technological adeptness, but I won’t be joining you there.
On reading this back I come over as a pompous oaf. Didn’t mean to. But it’s written now so it might as well be posted