Today's philosophical šŸ˜Ž

Have you purposefully created a record collection or just accumulated records over time? If so, is it a record collection? :thinking:

I don’t know whether mine is a good record collection or not, whatever a ā€œgood record collectionā€ is. I buy records I like, end of. Sometimes this means I have most or all of an artist’s albums or just the one or a 12" single/EP because they only recorded one track I liked.

It is my record collection. It probably isn’t anyone else’s.

I have collected other things to form a complete set but not for my music.

Mine is a collection of records. Some complete band sets (like my Rush collection), pockets of a band or artist I like but not all of their catalogue (like Dream Theater or ELP) and lots of odds and sods.
It spans many different genres and the oldest was pressed before I was born.
I think the great thing about most collections is their uniqueness to the owner.
I consider mine to be the soundtrack of my life. A bit ā€˜cliched’ I know, but…:man_shrugging:t2:

1 Like

Very much so. I was recently invited to take my pick from a collection of about 3000 CDs accumulated by a late someone over several decades. I only took about 30, mainly because there wasn’t much overlap between my interests and those of the deceased. I was grateful, of course, and glad they weren’t just being skipped, but also a bit sad that no-one else was going to get the same pleasure out of them as he presumably had.

Sic transit etc.

Mark

2 Likes

OED definition of collection: A group of things or people collected or gathered together. so whichever way it arose it is a collection!

I have a recording collection (by the above definition), but I do not consider myself s collector: I buy things only because I want to have them to play, not to, for example, have a complete set of an artist

3 Likes

Mine is not really a collection, but an accumulation of LP’s CD’s and digital downloads. My collection reflects my changing tastes over the years, and my search for interesting ā€œsoundsā€.

I probably would not miss 90% of the music I have accumulated. The other 10% I would miss dreadfully. I have albums that I play regularly, and albums I play to death for a while, and then forget.

6 Likes

Taking the philosophical view:

It is what it is.

3 Likes

I did have a very large collection that used to be played, but is now in storage unplayed.
That would make it like Martin Heideggers ā€˜Daseinā€ - being there - yet also in itself defined by not being there by its absence.
A tenet that influenced much of the 20th/21st century popular philosophical writings.

I today take a post modern structuralist view of longing…. (Non post structuralist as the lost ā€œthereā€ is somewhat still obtainable)

1 Like

I’m probably a bit of both, I have some specialized styles (like ā€˜lowercase’, ā€˜dark industrial’ and ā€˜microsound’ in electronic music or wagner operas) where I buy albums but I dont collect everything released in those niches. And of course I buy anything I like to listen to no matter where it belongs.

I buy records, any collection that results is a freebie that comes with them.

2 Likes

Well my assemblage is not a collection in the way that a stamp collection might have been. In the past I may have bought and read everything I could get my hands on by, for example, Thomas Hardy or Ian Furst. That approach never worked for me for music; but I tried with say Sibelius. However, I soon became selective in my purchases - I bought what I liked.

Streaming has brought back bad habits - I must cull my library of those downloads that did not make it to ā€˜listen later’.

1 Like