Best Sytem for Stageline N

Hi everybody,

Using Stageline N on Nait XS 2 with Nagaoka MP 110 on a classic Thorens TD 160 with TP 16 - I am a bit disappointed

What would be the ideal system to use, listening jazz and classic

Audio Technica Vm 95s
Ortofon Bronze

Any other?

Thanks!

You might need to qualify what you mean by ā€œdisappointedā€. What is your expectation? What is that expectation based on?

There could be many problems and diagnosing a solution without symptoms is hard. For example, if it is the setup showing up less than great older pressings, an amp with [dreaded] tone controls might be a better solution. Itā€™s really going to depend on an accurate problem description.

I use the tone control scenario purely because Iā€™m familiar with it - not suggesting thatā€™s your issue. A few pressings from the 70s need a heavy hand to be playable in my collection.

1 Like

Youā€™re running fine line styli on both of those cartridges. How do you adjust VTA with your arm?
Does another phonostage put the stageline to shame?

My second deck carries an Aro with a London Decca Maroon (and 8g of brass) feeding a Stageline N powered from my pre and Iā€™m surprised by how good it is, though it does pick up pops and clicks more than Iā€™d like.
Iā€™m also surprised that VTA still seemed to have a fairly narrow sweet spot despite the spherical stylus and readjusting VTF after each VTA adjustment.

Disappointed in general: bass, treble resolution, dynamics, quality. It sounds a little dull, especially with many orchestra / classical recordings, especially solo violin for example

Not that i expect miracles from nagaoka 110ā€¦ but it seems it sounded better with a cheap pro ject phono box s

Shouldnā€˜t be like thatā€¦

Naim Stageline is quite a dark and earthy sounding phono stage so you probably need to match it with a brighter sounding cartridge.

What I read just now from a review : smooth and well balanced cart, dynamic, but a bit rolled off in the highs and lacks some body and bass.

Nagaoka MP200 is quite a step up from the MP110 in these aspects and works well with the Stageline. For a different sound you could try known alternatives like the Goldring 2000 series (also made by Nagaoka, 2100 is well-liked). Many are happy with a 2M Ortofon Bronze. Good luck!

Try the VM540ML

In the past I had the Rega Exact, still produced, with Rega deck and Stageline. It worked very well.
But here the characteristics of the Thorens Tp160 arm should be checked, to see what are the optimal cartridges with that arm.

1 Like

Which cart do you refer to?

Maybe you know the perfect Match in ā€žresonableā€œ price spheresā€¦? What do you think of the mentioned audio technica / Ortofon Systems?

Sorry what ist vta/vtf etcā€¦ not really knowing the english terms

Currently using nagaoka, the question is wether ortofon or audio technica might be the Solution

Iā€™ve always enjoyed the AT MMs with the Stageline N and Naim 322/522 N boards.

Yours, the MP110

VTA = Vertical Tracking Angle and is related to stylus rake angle, the angle of the stylus contact with the groove.

I misread your original post so thought you were already using the AT and Ortofon you mentioned.

VTF = Vertical Tracking Force = Tracking Weight

The AT VN95EN would be my pick if you want to liven things up a bit, the 95ML and S versions will be potentially more resolving but only if adjusted with precision and risk sounding duller if not.

From what I read, you need a medium compliance cartridge for your deck / arm. Rega Exact 2 and Audio technica seem to match well.
Ortofon bronze is on the medium / high compliance. But may work too.

+1 I am very happy with an AT VM750SH on an Ittok arm running into StageLine N phono stages on the aux2 input of a NAC252 and NAC282 as well as N boards on a NAC42.

I tried an Exact2 on a Rega RP6 with the same StageLine N phono stages and N boards as above, but it just did not work for me.

Are there really two questions?

  1. is a phono cartridge compatible with a Thorens TP16 arm?
  2. is a cartridge compatible with a Naim Stageline N?

I have no idea about 2), then I have not seen, heard or fitted a phono cartridge to TP16 since last century. I am reasonably certain that was a Shure M75 ED2.

I suggest signing up to and doing some searches on the Vinyl Engine site. I had not realised that there were three versions of the arm. Comments in some of the discussions about the arm swing from far better than an SME 3009 to far worse. There are then comments that it is not the most straightforward arm to set up.

One review of the Nagaoka says it lacks dynamics and has poorly defined treble, so perhaps the Stageline is revealing what that reviewer hears?

Are you happy that your TP16 is in good condition?

The Vinyl Engine site has tables that give an idea of compatibility entering the specifications. It may be that from the specification point of view that an Ortofon 2M Blue is a closer match, so of the two cartridges mentioned, the AT is a closer match. Of the comments above, @Richard.Dane says he has enjoyed AT MM cartridges with a Stageline N.

Personally, I prefer AT to Ortofon MM, but I do not fit the norm on this forum. My hearing, equipment, room are not the same as yours.

1 Like

Hi Cellohannes, another consideration, taking into account the sound qualities youā€™re disappointed with, is what your equipment and the Thorens in particular are sitting on. My experience over many years is that in terms of dynamics and clarity particularly when the music is complicated either through loads of notes and/or interplay between instruments, turntable support in particular makes a significant and critical difference the sound qualities you mention.
My second deck was a Thorens 150, and I now have an early model LP12. It is my experience with the LP12 that led me to really appreciate the importance of equipment support. I bought and still have the first Lingo (Ā£450 ish), hailed as a game changer at the time, and it was a significant improvement, but I was disappointed that the dynamics and rhythm of the music hadnā€™t improved as I expected. The jazz I listened to was much better, but still confused and compressed too often. I just accepted that rest of my system,Meridian pre, Quad 405, Linn speakers, wasnā€™t good enough (first world problem!!).
Then came the new kid on the block - Mana supports. I got the small table for the LP12 (Ā£125 ish). Jaw dropped. Dynamics, leading edges improved so much, confusion and compression practically disappeared. The sound was now what I had expected from the Lingo. Absolutely accept that it wouldnā€™t have been as good without the Lingo, but it was the Ā£125 Mana, not the Ā£450 Lingo, that bought the smile to my face. My smile got wider as I gradually got Naim amps over the years, which now includes a stage line.
Incidentally, people pay good money to listen to the reference system, based on a 160 supported on layers of Mana supports in the B&B room offered by Mana inventor, John - sorry canā€™t remember his last name.
Clearly if your 160 is on a decent support, and you are happy with the sound of that support, then please ignore the above! It might well be the cartridge/ phono amp combo thatā€™s the issue.
Best wishes Amer

1 Like

Iā€™m afraid nothing beats trial and error here. I changed my MP110 for a MP200 for exactly the same reasons as yours and it worked very well. The Ortofon I have now (MC-3 Turbo) is better overall for most of the music that I like and my room, albeit different in several individual aspects.

There are some combinations that will provide optimal synergy (cart/arm/deck/psu/phono stage) and youā€™ll just have to find them starting from various established recommendations.
Audio Technica (AT) will be on one end of the scale, Ortofon and Goldring in the middle, and Nagaoka on the other end.

Your turntable is outside the usual collection of decks here, hence the wide range of well-meant advice. Good luck!