I’ve been thinking about my earlier post on this topic.
Also, looking at my album collection and considering your thesis some more.
I now realise my general rules for a complete collection are maybe a little more nuanced. Whilst the rule proposed above is good for most artists, there are exceptions.
Looking at our collection of Genesis studio albums, we have
- Trespass (1970)
- Nursery Crime (1971)
- Foxtrot (1972)
- Selling England by the Pound (1973)
- The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway (1974
- A Trick of the Tail (1976)
- Wind & Wuthering (1976)
- … And Then There Were Three … (1978)
- Duke (1980)
- Abacab (1981)
- Genesis (1983)
All above were bought original, when I started to listen to music, from late 70’s onwards. In recent years, we have added remastered vinyl versions, for the few that are favourites.
By “And Then There Were Three”, Genesis was a different act. I don’t really consider anything after this studio album to be truly Genesis. Although the three guys Collins, Banks and Rutherford carried on, with great success. But they had evolved into something that produced very different material.
For me, the high point is the mid 70’s. Maybe SEBTP to ATTWT.
Out of a love of Genesis, we also have all the solo works, of Mike Rutherford (and the Mechanics), Tony Banks, Phil Collins, Steve Hackett and Peter Gabriel. As well as Bill Bruford, Brand X and one or two others, that the Genesis band members collaborated.
Looking at our collection of New Order studio albums, we have :
- Movement (1981)
- Power, Corruption & Lies (1983)
- Low-Life (1985)
- Brotherhood (1986)
- Substance (1987)
- Technique (1989)
- Republic (1993)
- Get Ready (2001)
I don’t really consider “Movement” to be New Order proper. When you listen to the entire works of both Joy Division and New Order, you hear the genesis of Movement more in JD than NO. For me, it’s a work in progress between the two artistic styles. As a result, I’m not really a big fan of Movement. But I ended up buying it anyway, to be completist.
Substance (1987) is also an odd exception, as it’s a collection of singles or a type of compilation. I used to buy 12” singles and had many of the New Order ones. At the time, I wanted this on a CD to play at parties.
Furthermore, don’t consider anything past 1990’s as New Order proper. They disbanded in 1993. Only to reform in about 1998. So, the addition of Reply (2001) is an odd one. It’s a decent enough album. Again, bought it to be completist. But by then, the magic, (at least for me), was gone. In the end, Peter Hook left the band in 2007. The band was already evolving into a different sound.
So, again, I feel a band evolved into something else, not right to include in my own “curated” collection.
Japan and David Sylvian
I can only think of both Japan and David Sylvian as a whole. We have the following studio albums :
- Quiet Life (1979)
- Gentlemen Take Polaroids (1980)
- Tin Drum (1981)
- Oil on Canvas (1983)
- Brilliant Trees (1984)
- Secrets of the Beehive (1987)
- Dead Bees on a Cake (1999)
Rain Tree Crow
Although Japan started as a glam rock act, in the early 70’s, I found them around 1980, with just 2-3 years to go before they disbanded. Went to see them live twice and was wowed.
David Sylvian started his solo career following Japans split in 1983. When I listen to his 80’s albums it’s difficult for me to separate it all. It sounds like an evolution of an artistic direction.
The Japan band members rejoined briefly, for one studio album project. When listening to “Rain Tree Crow” (1991), this also sounds like a continuation too. I’m guessing this might also be because David Sylvian did the post studio production work for this album.
I don’t have any of the more recent DS albums. (Yet). I’ve always intended to listen to the ones we don’t have at some point. Let’s call it a work in progress.
In the meantime, I’ve been gradually buying the Japan and earlier DS albums as remastered 180g vinyl, which have gradually been released in more recent years.
We have all three of the studio albums
- O (2002)
- 9 (2006)
- My Favourite Faded Fantasy (2014)
DR has released two other live albums, which we probably wouldn’t add to our collection.
O was originally released on CD, in 2002. It was only 2018 when anyone could get a copy of the newly released 180g vinyl version.
Some artists release in one format and not another. (Not always vinyl). Some of the smaller, less well known artists can only be found on “download” formats. So, that’s a factor too.
We have recently collected the following studio albums :
- Folklore (2020)
- Evermore (2020)
This is interested - two albums - probably considered as a complete body of work, together.
They are a departure from TS’s usual fare. Myself and my wife happen to really like them both. For me, it’s more about the other artists - collaborating on these albums - The National, Bon Iver, Haim, etc. But we probably wouldn’t otherwise have a TS album. (Famous last words. “Never say never” and all that). At least not from her back catalogue. Maybe she will collaborate with others and produce similar material.
So a few examples to illustrate it does depend. Perhaps it depends on how we organise things in our mind, that influences where we stop with a complete collection. Perhaps a complete collection is always going to be curated in some way, that is personal.
[ Note : Please consider my points about a collection, rather than anything about the actual musicians or specific albums. These are only mentioned for illustrating the point about “exceptions” to a general rule proposed ].
Hope this adds further refined thoughts to the idea of being a vinyl completist and specifically what constitutes a complete and finished collection. Or even a curated collection.