Linn Kan vs Naim IBL

Hello, Richard, I had Kans many years ago, which I bought from Fleabay (or similar) for not a lot, as the cabinets were tatty (although the drive units were fine). I filled in the dings with wood filler, and sanded and sealed them, and used them for a few years until my elder son “borrowed” them to make up a sound system when he went off to Edinburgh Uni.

He still has them today, now with a glorious piano black n-Sub, which I found from a seller in Cricklewood (or somewhere in London), for which I handed over quite a large wad of “folding” (as Arthur Daley would say) some years ago.

Merry Xmas to you, sir, kick off your shoes and have a couple of decent bottles of the red stuff!

5 Likes

Thanks Graham. Will have to wait as I have lunch to cook, and there’s the forum of course…

1 Like

I’m sure that all Forum Members will be on their very best behaviour for Christmas Day, so you may be able to relax just a tiny bit!

1 Like

I was merely speculating on reasons for 20 Kans…

As for bass, I think it depends on what you consider to be bass response and good! For me that means full undiminished output down to 30 Hz or lower as well as taut, to hear (and feel) fundamentals of the lowest recorded notes, not just fill in from their harmonics.

That aside, have a great Christmas!

2 Likes

I owned either Kan 1 & 2 ('87 & '91) different now IBL S1, different times & systems, Kan at their best with analoghe. Overall i prefer IBLs now. However, nostalgia sake, i’d like to own a pair of Kan 1 again.
Merry Xmas you all.

2 Likes

Kans definitely perform best with an analogue front end - a Sondek in particular, which I guess makes sense.

1 Like

All speakers perform best with an analogue front end :wink:

6 Likes

I owned kans 1 &2 from 87 to 2010 right before jumping into nSat, frinted by Lp12 Ekos Troika/Archiv

Very well said and Merry Christmas :mrs_claus:

1 Like

Thanks ! :blush: Merry Christmas :christmas_tree:

1 Like

Another Kan fan here. Loved them. Had mine for about 25 years, then changed to ProAc Response 2 bought from a friend, which were also good.

ProAcs have gone now in favour of 805 D3.

But I still think of the years with the Kans…addictive little things.

2 Likes

What are your fav version/s?

Early MK 1 with Scanspeak tweeters. I also have a very early pair 10xxx, very lively indeed.
MK II Kustone are also very good when active,I have a pair that I updated with Ninka tweeters, they are more refined.

3 Likes

Thanks.

My best pair are serial 16,xxx but i wish id kept my 10,xxx active pair and connected a passive crossover externally instead of selling on.

1 Like

Great ! Wow active 10xxx,rare indeed !! I know the feeling, I always regret selling Kans…

3 Likes

This thread is making me nostalgic. My first speakers were a pair of late Kan Is (1988), fronted by a 32.5 / HiCap / 140, which was later changed for a 250. On the right material, they had a vivid and direct quality I’ve never heard from any other speaker, but I never overcame their tendency to be strident and fatiguing. In those days, it was a rare listening session that went beyond a single record.

I still have them in my attic, along with their matching stands. I would be very tempted to set them up in my current space, but it would need some major rearrangement to get them hard against a straight wall, and that’s not on the cards (my current speakers are in a shallow bay). But I remain curious.

3 Likes

I have found in the rooms I have had, that they sounds better if not hard against the wall, about 5 cm for MK1 and up to 10 cm for Kan II, otherwise the bass gets stuck in the wall.

2 Likes

I remember a mint rosewood pair of Kans were on the bay about a year ago. I should’ve just bought them and kept them as a future project. I do also like the black ash colour too.

In the IBL I’ve only seen black ash.

Don’t be sad, you want an earlier pair than that rosewood pair :wink:
I saw a pair of walnut IBL,not so long ago.

Couple of retro pics of my system at the time with IBLs then Kan’s.
It was 1987/88 :scream:


15 Likes