I can only agree. I’ve listen to 100’000€ systems that sounded worse, to me, than a Brio MK7 + 5000 series by Q Acoustics. I was shocked, really. I should thank these comparisons because, as it happened to you, I also came back home pleased with my system (even though I’m always willing to improve things here and there if possibile).
That’s a different target from ours and it’s totally fine that both exist. What’s worrying is that gear in the middle is sort of disappearing. Think about the 202 / 200 DR. Now you need to pay double the price if you want separates and it’s neither good nor sensible. It’s a pity IMO that @Maury_Finkle wants to replace them. I love the Brio and IO, but the there’s no comparison with that combo. However as long as he’s happy, it’s great.
Agree, easy to get good result whilst designed to attract newcomers. For the same reason it hits the ceiling so soon that leave you want for more.
I love my Brio, and thinking an Elex would give more but it just different. A demo of Elicit is even worse. I heard Aethos is a Brio with muscle but I obviously lost the interest and moved on.
But just saying, Naim IME is another story. Nait is great, but better amps are better. Top amps are defo all-rounded – speed, bodies, muscle, prat, grip, warmth etc everything. Can’t see myself downgrading.
Sorry; those were two slightly disconnected thoughts or conversations from me - I am indeed thinking about replacing the 200/202 but with a SN3/XS3/N50. The io / Brio experiment is exactly that, a low-cost VFM experiment to try out some Rega amplification, DAC, onboard phono stage, and pair it up with my P3.
I don’t think a € 500/900 all in one will better a 200/202 w a phono stage, but do think it will outclass my 60s-era Pioneer receiver.
I have to agree, you can really feel the Naim amp hierarchy IME. If you are lucky to get a good one, I would find it hard to downgrade as well.
No worries @Maury_Finkle, now it’s clear. The old 202/200 is IMO on pair with the SN3. If you consider the 202/200DR the difference is instead pretty clear to me, especially if you add a FC or HC. On the other hand I’d say the N50 is a different (and great) experience.
The IO / Brio would be a little great experiment, no doubt. I would really consider them for a small second system. Hopefully you’ll get one sooner or later, good luck!
That’s true. If you know what you are doing and find good s/h gear, it could be a fantastic bargain. Surely Naim won’t benefit from that so I hope sooner or later there will be something like a SN4 and more affordable separates as well.
I think Naim do very well from the second hand market. A lot of Naim sales come from Naim customers upsizing and these days frequently downsizing .
Also a degree of work comes from ongoing refurbishment . Funnily enough I was recently looking at a Nait 2 as an alternative to a Brio , first job would be to have it serviced
Yes, there is a clear delineation between the two in some ways , but in others Rega are catching Naim up
I am looking for a second system (if and when I move) (I would prefer root canal work without anaesthetic as an easier alternative ) and a Rega Brio, with BluSound Node, a CI102 or an Atom are the stand out options. Funds will dictate
Rega are cleaning up the open goal that Naim are no longer keeping. Namely entry level. New 100 series would be a smart move. After all in marketing terms Rega are turntables. Naim are the rest.
Competition with a range of very cheap Chinese boxes would be a challenge, even for Rega.
They might have something on test bench, I guess software could be reason they don’t proceed.
And as long as turntables are selling like hotcakes it seems, and a massive range of cartridges and integrated amps fill up factory, are there room for more ?