Seven Years with Uniti Core

It was indeed - I think I called ‘Dead Unitiserve’s Society’… :slight_smile:

2 Likes

That’s the one.

I wonder if anyone have an opinion on the Naim Unit Core compaired to ripping in WAV or wave using a computer ect? Which one have a better SOUND and is it worth the price?

1 Like

I have ripped my entire collection in Wav and Flac on a Uniti Core. I cannot, with hand on heart, say that can consistently say I noticeably discern a difference. I will rip my collection again for my Zenith, probably in Wav, just for the sheer hell of it. :blush:

1 Like

I started ripping on a Mac, continued on a Unitiserve, and used a Core for a little while. At no point could I reliably determine any difference between different rips when played back on the same hardware.

2 Likes

We were discussing this on another threads here I commented

1 Like

No.

You could rip on a PC with freeware or dbPoweramp for £60.

You could rip on an Innuos ripper for 1/3 of price.

The Core has no compelling value proposition.

Thanks for your reply. I am new to this and never thought it is so complicated using dBpoweramp after the second cd rip and the metadata stopped working.

We ripped 1000s of CD using dbPoweramp with AccurateRip, very few issues.

If you want to suffer from metadata issues buy a Core.

I do not want to, just need help to figure out why I stop getting the artwork in dBpoweramp.

No idea why you’d have an issue on artwork only.

We ran all rips through MusicBrainz Picard - very few issues. Nice consistent metadata on all rips.

Try Flac, as I suggested you above and David Hendon too.

Other than it sounds a whole heap better than ripped files played back from a PC with it’s inherent noisy environment.

3 Likes

Over ethernet it sounds exactly the same as our NAS.

And via SPDIF it sounds exactly the same as over ethernet.

1 Like

Yes, I was really referring to using a PC though.

1 Like

Yes, got you. Definitely a better option than a PC!

We’ve tried all sorts into our nDAC and the Core does have a very good SPDIF feed.

1 Like

I’ve tried SPDIF versus the Ethernet and couldn’t discern a difference, so use Ethernet to get the better functionality and album artwork.

Absolutely. We do same, with Core hidden well away from rack.

But as we only use it to rip, it’s mainly a nice piece of furniture.

1 Like

I thank you for your comment and I understand it works better in Flac but I prefer to rip my cd’s in WAV / wave Frenchrooster. So I am giving it my best shot to be able to achieve what I set out to do and that is to get a copy of all my cd’s in WAV / wave.

1 Like

Any suggestions? By the way I am using the trial version before getting the paid version. The first cd rip went well but now the others do not give me any metadata or covers.