System woes

The old platform products, including the 272, remain fully supported. They do today what they’ve always done, and in fact a lot more than when they were first introduced. They had to be replaced because the tech simply isn’t able to cope with more services, such as Qobuz.

It should have been able to support Qobuz in my opinion though and that’s the problem for me.

The 272 was introduced in 2015 not 2009 so I really don’t understand why it couldn’t have Qobuz implemented as an update.

They underestimated online streaming, we know. It couldn’t be added as an update because the hardware is insufficient. But they learned, and the new streamers have ample headroom in the hardware for adding new stuff. In addition, not much will change in online streaming anymore, beyond 24/192 and delivery via internet. What else would there be?

3 Likes

Better DACs?

If so, could these be retrofittable to gen 2 Naim streamers?

Maybe, but that has nothing to do with the streaming part really, and is not part of Naim’s ability or willingness to support streamers with updates. Better DACs are more like better amps and better turntables, they may be released and if you always waited for that you would still be listening with a Walkman.

I don’t know if Naim could upgrade to a better DAC in the hardware, but you can always use the digital out

I was referring to the suggestion of a short shelf life for Naim streamers and your suggestion that gen 2 Naim streamers have greater built in longevity.

I agree that streamer hardware and platform in gen 2 streamers look more able to accommodate future developments in demands from higher res material (local and subscription streaming) but DAC technology has the capacity to develop further. So it could this that drives the next gen streamers.

The current DACs used in Naim streamers are old and no longer manufactured I believe.

BTW I seem to remember upgrading the DAC in a Arcam DVD I had many years ago, so DAC module substitution should technically be possible.

Just idle speculation on my part, no evidence to support this view.

I know what you were referring to :slight_smile: But @roda had been concerned about the streaming services like Spotify CD and not adding Qobuz to the 272, and that’s what I was referring to. And that’s the part that affects if a streamer can still be useful in 5 or 10 years, and the part that carries an expectation for after-sale updates and long-term support.

As far as hardware goes, including DACs, I believe we are all used to the concept of getting what you buy. Maybe DAC development has more life in it, but you can also buy a P8 or 10 now, and then a P12 is released a month later. You might then want the P12, but it does not take anything away from what you have. Same with a DAC. (And that’s the the difference to the streaming part, where the whole box could become useless if a new service wiped out everyone else and support for it could not be added. My point was that this is unlikely with the new streamers)

Sure you could design it for the DAC to be a module that can be replaced, just like you can design a PC with the GPU being replaceable. Or the turntable with replaceable parts (Linn vs Rega). Like all these things, it also comes with trade-offs.

That’s like me saying that my petrol car should be able to run on water. Just because you think it should doesn’t make it any more possible.

The 272 predated the new streaming platform by 2 -3 years. So several years ahead of first gen introduced in say, 2011. The 272 was taken off the market reasonably quickly by Naim standards.

From my perspective only, I would be somewhat peeved having paid for one to find out that the technology in the 272 was not up to scratch to implement Qobuz. Especially when the likes of Jason Gould are saying in online videos it’s 4 times better than Tidal.

I think this incapable technology aspect is a bit of a cop out myself . If first gen software could accommodate Tidal why not Qobuz as well? Is it that dramatically different to Tidal software wise? The newer 272 should have been one step ahead of the first gen platform surely to a certain extent to allow for further advances?

Anyway, product shelf life concerns applies to other hifi manufacturers as well, so I will get off my high horse and make the most of my nd5xs2 for as long as possible. I guess we all hope that any new formats like Spotify Hifi cd/hires resolution, will be attainable at even lower price points and whatever streamers we are using at the time hopefully can accommodate them.

Have a good rest of day folks.

When you are paying out £4k it is not entirely unreasonable to think so.

Cheaper options are obviously available.

1 Like

Yes, they could have built a platform capable of hi-res internet streaming in 2015. They didn’t. It was not a good decision with regard to future proofing, I would not have been too happy either had I bought a 272, but water under the bridge, they learned their lesson.

1 Like

Fair comment. I’m off to listen to some music rather than worrying about the future.

Cheers guys. I’ll let the OP have their thread back now.

1 Like

Steve - completely understand…your issues are reliability and the problems you have been having. I understand and i really feel for you - your situation would drive me insane. My comment re box numbers was directed more at other posts discussing that issue.

Personally i like more boxes because as some have noted it keeps stuff that obsoletes out of my amps. As i said my 72/hicap/250 is 30 years old and just went through its 3rd Naim rebuild. There are some people who restore amps from the 1940s! How is that possible? Easy…simple designs and no digital stuff that obsoletes.

One question Steve re your vinyl crackling noise issue. Do you by chance use the Naim Aro tonearm? Reason is 4-5 years ago i started getting static crackling on my vinyl. Couldn’t figure it out. Finally found an article on the web indicating that there is grounding paint in the Aro and when it fails you get static crackling noise. I had the paint redone by the Naim authorized service center (avoptions) and problem completely fixed.

Richard thats great that Jason is the Naim brand ambassador i didn’t know that. Just a suggestion maybe ramp up the level of activity. More videos. Of course this must be balanced vs other responsibilities…i get that.

Enjoy your Bentley.

I’ve leased a VW Tiguan for a few years - the second day after delivery it developed a fault with an error popping up saying the rear parking sensor was faulty with an undefeatable pinging alarm sound and a clicking noise from the glove compartment.

Of course this error didn’t happen when reversing, only when driving forwards at above 20mph, so you’d have constant loud pinging throughout a journey. Local VW garage could not ‘look at it’ for 10-14 days, horrendous for a new vehicle and apparently as I signed the contract at the dealership VW leasing said I would have to lump it whereas if I’d done it via email I could have returned the vehicle under distance selling agreements!

This error happened a couple of times a few months later but has hopefully been quashed by a firmware update. I constantly get error with the cruise control sensors and can’t use it maybe 1 in 6 journeys without turning off the ignition and restarting which normally fixes it. VW put the errors down to ‘atmospherics’ - never had a single issue with a Golf I bought in 2006.

3 Likes

As Chris says I think most people here would like a classic series or higher level of quality but in a smaller footprint by either shoebox Cyrus size or 272 streaming preamp etc. style.

This was discussed in another thread about future development wish list and you like to hope that Naim staff do read and notice these threads

2 Likes

Three observations:

  1. My experience with Naim is that the sound quality and musicality is generally so engaging is that it is highly enjoyable even at “entry level.” I go back and forth (in two different homes) systems comprised of (a) XS2 and ND5 XS2 and (b) 282, 200 DR, HC DR, NDX2 and XPS DR. While the latter system is obviously at a very different level, I am quite happy listening to both. With both systems I get the wonderful feeling of listening to music.
  2. “Entry level” is in the ear of the beholder. I suspect some might find my 282 based system “entry level”, but I do not.
  3. In terms of box count, I initially ran my 282 powered by my 200 DR (three boxes including streamer if you ignore the near invisible NAPSC). While the addition of the HC DR was a clear improvement, the 282/200 DR is a wonderful combination. I would heartily recommend it to anyone concerned about box count.
1 Like

@JasVerlen re the cracking noises. I tried thin copper strips between cart and headshell and all manner of things as I believed it to be a static issue. Others thought different on hearing it. No fault was ever diagnosed but a change of cart solved the problem.

@Gromit1 I agree it’s possible to enjoy “lower quality” systems. Indeed in this thread I’ve stated I know I can enjoy other systems. In fact my Nait5i / Node bedroom system has never failed to please and that’s due in no small part to my expectations of it.
However having had 282/250 before my current 252/300 I couldn’t go back there, or below, for my main system.

Didn’t someone claim that Lindemann’s Limetree Bridge uses the same streaming board?

P.S. Sadly the wrong colour… :wink:

1 Like

Possibly both are sourced from StreamUnlimited but they are different boards.

1 Like