Thanks for the great review. I’m sure @Bevo will be interested in this for his pondering.
Oh yes indeedy Mr Kiwi Mike
I’ll take a new 911S4 Targa over an old one any day
I wouldn’t, because there’s no way I would spend that much money
I’m thinking, does anyone of you who listened to these new classics think that the new sound signature is closer to Olive perhaps? I haven’t heard them and am only curious.
You should get your Naim dealer to comment on that - and to fix it. We simply cannot say…
I recall the Olive being the same sound as the original classic. So the new classic is the same sound as the old classic?
You guys are remarkable I can’t even remember what my current system sounds like and I played all afternoon.
Which is what did you say? . New classic, old classic, original classic? Olive doesn’t sound the same as black boxes with green lights
I had some help with my memory. Paul Stephenson said
“So in the second or third year I made the decision to discontinue every product in the range and we came out with the new Reference series. Looking back on that now, I think that, with the infrastructure we had, it could have been suicidal. I remember one night lying in bed and thinking, What if they don’t like it, or if the dealers won’t buy it?
CT: But you didn’t discontinue the 250?
PS: No, not the name, but we did. It was in the olive shape before I put it into the new range with a new design.
CT: It was a new amp.”
PS: It was a new amp. The 282 came out and the 252. Everything got replaced
Olive 250 should.
Only ever heard the 250DR
Naim’s designation for the new classic 250 is, 250-3.
Why don’t we just call it 250-3.
I know what is going to be released and more or less when. All I can say to 500 level owners is unless you have deep pockets for a state of the art streamer enjoy what you have without temptation for years to come
And, in a 2021 independent consumer report, came 27th out of 28 car manufacturers for reliability. Perhaps there’s something to be said for Naim’s more cautious approach to releasing new product.
Roger
Thankfully not my experience of Tesla.
Complex electronic products, however well tested pre launch, will always have teething problems. I don’t think Naim is different in this regard.
Naim’s designation for the new classic 250 is, 250-3.
That’s even more confusing, as wasn’t the Classic Black originally called the 250-2, then came the DR version, which would in theory become 250-3 although known as 250-DR. So what that says is we have
NAP250BD (Bolt-Down)
CB-250 (Chrome Bumper)
NAP-250 (Olive)
NAP-250-2 (Classic Black)
NAP-250DR (Classic Black)
NAP-250-3 (New Classic)
I suppose we should really give up on any clear Naim naming convention as it’s never made much sense, and perhaps that make it even more eccentric .
A famous quote: “There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation and naming things”. Although relevant to Naims digital bits, I do wonder whether there is a hardware equivalent of cache invalidation?
No less confusing than Car Manufactures numbering I suppose.
BMW, Mercedes, Porsche (Who are truly mad… )
And the bolt down cb 250?