Actually don’t mind vinyl records and CD’s and books on shelving. It can all be done in an aesthetically pleasing way too.
As I saw in a post on another site I think our ire should be directed at the labels/rights holders provided the streaming service has done things appropriately.
My assumption is that it’s the labels/rights holders who are saying they’ll no longer supply streaming content or allow re-downloads rather than the streaming services for whom it makes sense to have the widest possible content portfolio.
Maybe it’s a bit of both, but for the streaming provider it has to be financially viable to offer content assuming there are fees to do that by default.
I rather suspected this thread would morph into yet another CD vs streaming debate. So in an attempt to address the question in the OP, at one time I did consider switching from Qobuz to Presto which is entirely Classical and Jazz. In the end lack of integration with my streamers meant I stuck Qobuz.
One of the big pluses for me is that when I read about an interesting album in one of the Music Room threads, most of the time I can find it and listen to it (at zero marginal cost) straight away. There are often discussions on the Classical thread about the relative merits of different performances and I enjoy doing the comparisons myself and seeing if I agree with other posters. So Qobuz stays, for the time being at least.
Roger
Same here.
DG…
Actually, thought this one might be more straightforward
Few weeks back, for all the reasons stated, decided to unsubscribe from Qobuz. During the weeks that followed became aware that others - from time to time - unsubscribe too.
So, genuinely thought it would be an interesting topic to explore why forum members - for all the various reasons - decide to unsubscribe form a music streamer service
Hope they helps ( to stimulate thought)
R
This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.