What’s the last movie you saw in the cinema

Has there ever been a review of a book/film/TV programme in Private Eye that hasn’t been scathing? :wink:

I’ll concede on all your points (except perhaps on Sean Penn). But it was 2 hrs and 40 mins of bravura film making ( and agreed - best film chase ever ) that had me utterly gripped from beginning to end and for me that makes it film of the year and PTA’s ‘masterpiece’

PS That moment when it moves from Act 1 to Act 2 with his now 16 yr old daughter is practicing her martial arts to Steely Dan’s ‘Dirty Work’. For no good reason that had me feeling quite emotional and that’s a mark of how good PTA is IMO

1 Like

The friend who sent me the PE review nevertheless went to see it on my recommend this morning. He thought it excellent. I’m just awaiting his take on Penn although his initial observation was that it was far too close to General Michael Flynn for comfort.

Just a personal thing but I struggled with the use of Dirty Work, although the soundtrack in general was also excellent. King Princess did a fabulous version earlier this year for s4 of Hacks and, once you’d seen the use of it there, it was never going to work in anything else.

Ironically far better a song than anything on her new album.

1 Like

And I quote…

“The film can be nuanced even if some of the characters within are not, I think Andersen shows where his sympathies lie. Could argue that modern fascism is based on unjustified grievance filtered though simple-minded “solutions”, they have chosen not to let the real-world in and this needs to be highlighted.”.

I don’t disagree.

1 Like

So today, as an antidote to hours and hours of Delay Repay and Passenger Assistance complaints I went to see The Smashing Machine.

I’ve zero interest in wrestling nor this specific biography. Dwayne Johnson nevertheless gave probably his best acting performance, although I’m not convinced it was as nuanced as the critics suggested. It was a bit like Penn in One Battle i.e. right on the edge of caricature at best. Emily Blunt gave a very odd performance although ultimately I suspect they were both hamstrung by the script. It was a feast of cliche and ultimately unsatisfying but enjoyable enough I guess.

The text summary of what happened next was utterly bizarre and left more questions than answers. After his partner (Blunt) was effectively sectioned by him he loses his key fight but apparently they “reconciled” 10 days later and were married for 6 years. It concludes with the fact that he fought on for another 9 years. Say what…

1 Like

The latest Downton. Glossy sentimental cobblers.

1 Like

Spartacus..with Kirk Douglas

2 Likes

Maybe cheesy in some movies but I’ve always loved Dwayne Johnson as the ‘good guy’ in so many movies - he doesn’t seem to take himself too seriously which is a fine trait.

Looking forward to seeing this movie. Emily Blunt looks great these days, I thought she was younger.

Good interviews on Graham Norton’s show a few weeks ago.

1 Like

I watched Tron: Ares on Saturday - it was my daughter’s birthday and she fancied seeing it. Utter tosh; the story, script and acting were very dodgy but it did keep me watching for the two hours run time. Certainly one for the cinema for the scale and sound as long as you can switch your brain off for a bit. The thread running through the Tron movies certainly got stretched with this one.

1 Like

One of the reviews described the film as a ‘giant screen saver’!

3 Likes

I like that description :joy:

1 Like

Watched “I Swear” this afternoon with Mrs. H. Had an attack of foul and abusive language myself :angry: .

Whilst I understand the need to use the likes of Henderson, Mullen and Peake for a film which might otherwise not attract the audience it deserves, it does mean they end up playing the same roles repeatedly and, good as they are, the worthiness can grate.

Nevertheless a much better film than expected. Struggled with it a fair bit for all the right reasons because it resonated so much with my own experience of disability so I had a couple of dark moments watching it. Annoying that they resorted to a fair bit of cliche - the physical ticks producing violent responses in others and the verbal ticks being played for laughs or shock - whereas in real life it’s often the other way round but, overall, an excellent watch and it stuck with the real story far more than these things usually do.

Film had just started when the bloke in a couple behind us and to one side simultaneously asked if I could move my “stick” and decided to do it himself without waiting for an answer. Several observations.

One, it’s a “white cane” you twerp.

Two, nothing could be more offensive than not waiting for the answer. It’s the equivalent of saying “Would you like some help across the road?” being asked by someone who at the time of asking has already linked arms and dragged you halfway across said road. Red rag to a bull I’m afraid.

Three, the camber at the Everyman slight but such that even if you lay back drink in hand there is no physical way the top of my cane is interrupting your line of sight to anything on the screen. I have previously tested it for myself by parking it there, walking a row back and seeing for myself. Being blunt about it, this was a d@ckhead trying a power play.

Four, why on earth would I do that? Basically because I’ve learned the hard way that if you fold a cane in an indoor space then no-one sees the sight loss and you’re subject to endless repeats of people expecting you to stand, move your stuff, let them pass to the bar or the toilets etc. with zero appreciation of just how difficult that is. Major issue at gigs or the theatre. Much less so at the cinema but still…

I normally sit with the cane between my legs so if anyone’s view is to be obscured it’s mine. Forgot to move it there and had it in front of the next seat as I was wrestling a coat, bag and Americano. Yeah, sorry about that but it still wasn’t obscuring your view of any part of the screen.

I didn’t really have a problem moving it if asked but this t@at didn’t wait and then spent the first third of the film whispering to his companion loud enough to disturb me and Mrs. H. whilst she laughed at all the tragic parts of the film that only a dimwit would think funny.

Snapped a third of the way in, propped my cane back up, asked him to STFU and suggested that if he had a problem with that he could move or report me to the cinema management. At that point I’d point out that he apparently thought it unacceptable that I faux disturbed his film experience whilst him and his drinking partner seemed to think it was okay to disturb everyone else’s experience.

There were only 7 of us in but as ever with these things, as soon as you’re brave enough to speak up, backup arrives. Woman a row behind them politely explained that they were “getting on my t@ts” and you “might be better in the bar” as they’d clearly no clue how to behave in a cinema. They stayed. He never said another word. She continued to laugh inappropriately. My cane stayed upright.

3 Likes

“100 Liters of Gold” (100 litraa sahtia) is a Finnish dark comedy, Two middle-aged sisters, Taina and Pirkko are famous sahti-makers from Sysmä. Sahti is a strong beer made today the same way as 500 years ago. The third sister, Päivi is getting married, and she asks her sisters if they could make 100 liters of sahti for the wedding. Unfortunately, it’s too good not to drink it. The sisters wake up in a horrible hungover the day before the wedding and realize they have drunk it all. They have only 24 hours to find 100 liters of good sahti. They both need to face the fact that they might like their own product a bit too much, and it’s not the only thing they need to face.

1 Like

It’s on Netflix as of now but yesterday I went to see A House Of Dynamite as part of its limited cinema run on the basis that it sounded a film best seen in a cinema. I’d be interested in the views of anyone else who saw it in the cinema but, on reflection, I think it’ll be fine on a large screen TV.

Interestingly, I didn’t quite think it lived up to the reviews. The multiple perspectives on the same 18 minutes were interesting but not wildly enlightening other than having a couple of genuinely shocking turn of events. I didn’t actually think it ever got as tense as they think it was. I did like the fact you left not knowing how it played out but it didn’t quite feel like the film for the nuclear age we were promised.


Fun Micheal Mann thriller. 7/10

4 Likes

I would go as far as 8.5/10 and the fascinating use of early digital photography as well, great movie

Martin

1 Like

Gone With The Wind

1 Like

Strange in the jazz club that the band were playing (miming) to Miles Davis (Bitches Brew I think).

1 Like

We saw the Springsteen movie -” Deliver me from Nowhere” last night . Honestly not a great film. Weak storyline which wasn’t told very well. We both got the feeling that the Film couldn’t decide what it was, was it a story of the album Nebraska being recorded if so it really didn’t or was it just about Springsteen’s mental health issues, which it eluded to but didn’t really investigate.
Sorry to anyone who liked it but it really was poorly crafted. Looks like the audiences think so too. We had an almost private viewing in our local cinema only one other couple there.

1 Like

Seeing it Tuesday morning with low expectations just because the book upon which it’s based is clearly nothing like the film and was one of the three best books I’ve ever read on music.

Hi Mike, I watched House Of Dynamite on my TV - I didn’t think that the film warranted a cinema trip and after watching it then that remains my view. I agree that it didn’t live up to the reviews; it is a well made and interesting film, using the multiple perspectives in which each perspective introduced more detail. In my view, the tension was never really realised: yes, they tried to introduce some pace but I didn’t feel the expected tension was dealt with effectively. Yes, it leaves you wondering what the final decision was but it did cover the aggressor/reactor scenarios pretty well I thought. Not quite the definitive film as you say.

1 Like