I am currently pairing 282/300 (non-dr) with ProAc D30R
I have a spare 200DR upfront, wonder a bi-amp exercise for which 200Dr for Tweeter & 300 (non-dr) for bass workable ?
I have no complaint against current performance of D30R, since a spare D20DR available, not sure if this works for a much better tweeter or bass performance or even sound stage ? Will try this weekend.
Bi- amping with different amps doesn’t work. Bi-amping needs to have exactly the same power amps, or an active crossover, if different amps are going to be used. I had D30R a few years ago and I currently have D20R. Not sure what you’re asking, ie the speakers?
Unless you have an active crossover (SNAXO) you are not driving the woofer and tweeter separately. You are just feeding the passive crossover with more power from the two amps.
Not sure about the ProAcs, but some speakers are reported to really benefit from biamping. As you have the 200 and the cables, just try it. I wouldn’t worry unduly about the amps not matching: the Supernait for example has a biamp output and any additional power amp will by definition be different.
If your system was mine, however, I’d be trading the two Hicaps and the 200 for a Supercap DR.
What does a HiCap have to do with bi amping? Anyway if one removes the jumpers on the ProAc’s they can be bi-amped since the internal crossover is split for bi-wiring or bi-amping. Your best bet not having an active crossover or matching amps would be a “ horizontal” bi amp with smaller amp driving L+R tweeters and the larger amp driving L+R woofers.
Honestly I think it’s not going to go well. Hopefully you don’t muck anything up.
Good Luck.
I have no knowledge of how the SNAXO works and wondered Hicap (current 2 pot of 4 pins service mono block of NAP300 leaving the remaining 4 pin pot to serve NAP200DR) will work.
You can connect the 200 to the third socket on your Hicap. This is passive biamping, which powers the different sides of the crossover in the speaker. So treble and bass is split at the speaker.
With active, the bass and treble are split in the electronic crossover, the naxo, at line level. This potentially gives a much better result but is more expensive and more complex.
The general rule of thumb was a single higher amp will always outperform any number of smaller amps. Therefore I would expect the Nap 300 to better the two Nap 200’s.
The reason being is that the Nap 300 has a bigger frequency response and should always sound better.
Depends if you’re doing vertical or horizontal bi-amping. Using a powerful amp for the bass on both sides and then the weaker amp to do the upper on both sides is a common setup.
By all means try it and decide for yourself, if we didn’t experiment we wouldn’t learn anything and you may find you prefer two 200’s which is fine