Hello All,
Current kit: NDX 2, Nait XS2, Quad Z-3’s.
As the first halfway house step onto the Naim separated amps upgrade-ladder would you:
• start with a pre-amp (with the XS2 as a power-amp)
• or get a power-amp (with the XS2 as pre-amp)?
I’m speculating I’ll plateau at around 282/250DR over a few years, but of course the beauty of separates is the extensibility, so… you know. I’ve ditched a previous plan to get a £5k-ish integrated amp and stick there, having realised (resigned myself!) I’m always going to end up wanting to upgrade, so I need to make it easier to scratch that itch.
I don’t mind things being a bit unbalanced during the periods between upgrades, within reason. It’s not a huge room so sound quality is the motivation (the Nait is already plenty loud enough).
(For simplicity I’ll talk below as though it’s pre-amp first, but presumably it’d just be the same but inverted for power-amp first?)
Everything depends on that intangible alchemy of patience vs dosh but I’m interested to hear if there’s any broad consensus on the logic of things.
The obvious routes seem to me:
- INCREMENTAL: NAC 202 then later NAP 200DR (can remove the XS2) then later 282 then later 250DR
- LEAPFROG: Save up a bit longer go straight to 282, then save up a bit longer and straight to 250DR (easier & simpler, but obviously constrained by the XS2 in the mean time)
- BLENDED: Some permutation of the above, e.g. 202, then save up a bit longer and straight to 250DR; or straight to 282 but get to 200DR as quickly as possible then later 250DR; or 202 » 200DR » 250DR » 282 etc.
There are also, of course, all the different power units, but I’m assuming excising the XS2 as soon as possible makes the most sense.
All thoughts and reflections welcome.
Thanks
Mark