Hifi News 300 series review

Hi-Fi Corner
1

Has someone read this November Hifi News review on the 300 series?
Is it worth reading it ? Do they compare vs the OC ?

Thanks

2

Yes, it’s a positive review. The conclusion reads:

‘The 300 series from Naim’s New Classics range fully lives up to its promise - its presentation combining a shade more warmth and culture when required with the ability to let go and power out the music when let off the leash. From the closely-detailed NSS 333 streamer/DAC to the effortlessly punchy NAC332/NAP350 amplification, this is the ‘Naim sound’ with broadened appeal, albeit never quite tamed.’

The sound quality is rated at 88%.

1 Like
3

“The ‘Naim sound’ with broadened appeal” :thinking:

Surely it should read ‘A New Naim sound with broadened appeal’

1 Like
4

I’m not sure what point you’re making. That seems to be a distinction without a difference.

2 Likes
5

My concern is that the ‘Naimness’ has been diluted. But it’s all conjecture until I listen with my own ears.

1 Like
6

It should likely have read “An improved Naim sound with broadened appeal.”

7

Interesting…how do they measure / rate sound quality?

2 Likes
8

Sorry, I don’t know the answer to that. I don’t buy Hi-Fi News as a rule, but I got this one to read about the new Naim equipment.

1 Like
9

If the primary attraction of Naim amps is the timing accuracy, being more neutral because now better at everything else without losing timing must be a benefit - and surely attractive to more people. On the other hand where the primary attraction is the “Naim sound”, that arose through focus on timing with other aspects less important, if that is a distortion from neutral accuracy then indeed making it more neutral might be negative even though timing accuracy remains.

2 Likes
11

Would you mind posting the link please? For the life of me I can’t find it on the Naim website.

2 Likes
13

Oops, sorry, went to see and found I had mis-remembered - it was the NAP 500 review I saw on there. I’ll delete my erroneous post.

14

That’s a shame. If it had been over 90% I may have been interested. I guess I’ll save my money.

7 Likes
15

What do they mean by “ never quite tamed” ? The contrary of a polite sound ?

16

Still wild (I assume from the context here that they mean that in a good way)?

2 Likes
17

Sound quality 88%. That’s… what… good? bad? better than 87%? worse than 89%? What’s the Standard Deviation on that point estimate???
:rofl:

2 Likes
18

I don’t think much, if anything makes it beyond 90% on HFNRR. Basically, anything over 80% is excellent. I guess context is all here - best to take the number in light of the review, as without it means very little.

1 Like
19

Don’t they give every review 88% these days?

1 Like
20

It certainly seems that way…

21

Totally meaningless numbers! About as useful as the 5 stars HiFi Choice awards to most of the items it reviews.

3 Likes
22

Some very ‘clever’ comments here - apparently from people who haven’t deemed it necessary to read the review to consider that their comments are helpful.

1 Like