The speakers were the Kudos Titan 606 - the same as I have at home. My profile shows all details.
Very nice, but again, unfortunately, out of reach of my pocket book. Iām very envious though
.
Thank you but donāt forget, this is just my system - your system may give you just as much enjoyment. The 222 and 250 are apparently a great combination with great synergy.
Phew thought it was just me. I also tried the 333/332/250 combination (with a 300 feeding the 333) into Kudos S20A and thought I preferred my 222/300/250. As ever in this hobby everyone hears things differently.
Thanks for the question. Honestly, I have not have enough time with the system to really analyze the difference between connecting the NPX300 to the 333 or to the 332. Since I have a CD transport and turntable it may make most sense to connect the PS to the preamp. We will see.
They certainly are! After a week with them I am very happy, the 250 drives my Sf Olympica Nova 2ās far better than the SN3, and I am not missing the NDX2. It maybe that the SN3 was limiting the NDX2 but I do not have space to hook it up to the 222 to test this. I will make space to drive the 222 with my XPS DR in a month or so. I already have the special Burndy ![]()
I remember clear improvements when I added the HiCapDR to the SN3, and again when I got the XPS for the NDX2.
Hi guys⦠due to space constraint , if i am to stack PS below the pre, will it compromise performance/ sound quality or any other ādiscountedā effects that I should be aware of ? Thanks ā¦
Certainly with the old classic range stacking the head unit on top of the power supply would appreciably lower performance. IIRC there was at least one member here who didnāt particularly think much of the NAC552 but had it stacked on top of the PS and so the results were unsurprisingā¦
@Richard.Dane ⦠hi Richard , so I suppose the same goes to the stacking of 332 and 300 ⦠thanks for the reply
I would guess so, but personally I havenāt tried it with the NC kit, so would reserve judgement until then. Possibly worth you mailing Naim support for someone like Jason Gouldās view here, or ask your dealer.
@Richard.Dane yup⦠shall do so and try out when doing a demo w the dealer ⦠Thanks again!!!
Hi Peppo62 , thanks for the video !!
Youāre welcome ![]()
I thought that Iād add my comments on my new NAC 332 / NPX 300.
Its had about 7 days of 24/7 playing and 2 weeks all up powered on.
I had a lovely long listening session last night. It has really opened up nicely now.
A preamp should really ātieā a system together, the āglueā that binds if you will.
I had a Chord Ultima Pre 3 that although a lovely pre. didnāt really seem quite right in my system.
A bit ātoo muchā of a good thing sometimes, just a bit in my face on some music. That grew tiring after a while.
The NAIM combo addresses that !!
It has all the resolution, PRaT, and an even bigger soundstage than the Chord had.
But with just a touch less aggressive nature. That was the missing part that I needed.
Last night Iām not sure if the 332/300 burn in has settled right down or what, but I was mesmerised on what I was hearing.
The PR&T, musicality, engagement was something to beheld.
That and the hifi technical traits that NAIM usually doesnāt do as well as similar priced gear, well in my previous experience with a NDS/555DR/252/SC2DR/300DR anyway.
It had soundstage depth and width that is amazingly good. The resolution seemed to be better than from brand new as well.
I canāt comment on the 300 power amps or NS333 as Iāve not heard them.
The XLR outlets are a god send for users who only have a NAIM premap. for example, they now plug ān play into my ATC actives.
Sure itās an expensive preamp, but for me and my needs itās a clear winner. Itās truly world class.
Because Iāve either had at home on demo or had a dealer demo of similar priced Octave Audio, Pass Labs, Accuphase and T+A preamps over the last 6m and the NAC 332/ NPX 300 combo has seen them all off.
One happy customer (except for another technical issue thread).
Canāt be a true NAIM product without something to complain about now can we ?
![]()
![]()
![]()
I guess you mean the new classic NAP350 monoblocs.
(Not the NAP 300DR).
Great to hear youāre enjoying it so much.
Ah yes Jim, typo on my part.
If I donāt have active ATCās, Iād most certainly have the 350 mono blocks and perhaps Kudos 606ās.
Iāve just noticed that the ground switch on my 333 is set to āFloatingā, Iāve not changed it, shouldnāt it be set to āDefaultā, which is ground? I donāt have any other source.
The 332 is set to āDefaultā
The labelling could be better:
333 - Floating | Default
332 - Default | Ground
Both should be set to āDefaultā in my case? Iāve now confused myself writing this ![]()
333 Should Be Default and 332 Should Be Default. The Ground should be at the primary source.