The latest Apple Watch. Not one for the watch purists, hence why I am not sure it’s allowed on this thread.
5 Likes
I’m sure it’s allowed, but I suspect most people on this thread just won’t recognise it as they’re more into mechanical ones. In general (also for HiFi etc.) I’d advocate to explicitly specify what something is unless clearly branded.
Compliments!Enjoy your new BB58.When I got mine three years ago the 54 was not on the market yet and so I didn’t have the problem of considering it.Anyway I prefer the 58 over 54.It’s a dive watch so they must have a certain size.
1 Like
The longer I have this, the more I like it. It’s often cited as the perfect everyday watch, and I can see why.
26 Likes
A great watch with a lovely Milanese watch strap.
Lovely. I do like the rubber strap, but couldn’t find one when I was buying mine.
1 Like
That Patek Philippe is lovely. Calatrava 5127 if I’m not mistaken. 
4 Likes
Every time I see that Patek I want it more. Absolute perfection.
5107 I think.
G
4 Likes
Oh stop it…
G
Sorry for being over cautious, but if that reference number is unique to you and your watch, you might want to re-edit that photo and blur out the reference number, in case some unscrupulous persons uses it for forgeries.
That Patek Philippe is beautiful, though I’d be scared to wear it if I had one. I agree very much about keeping things simple, which is why I like my little Railmaster so much. It’s very rare too, which makes it even nicer as one’s unlikely to see anyone else wearing one.
20 Likes
Lovely retro dial that is screaming out for a nice black strap. 
3 Likes
Summer watch time. As someone who has blue as a favourite colour I found it impossible to look past.
18 Likes
I like the bracelet on the older model much more than the newer (shiny polished) one.