With my current speakers:
Source (2x) 30.8%
Pre + phono pre: 25%
Power amp: 14.5%
Speakers: 4.2%
Signal cables: 8%
Power cables: 7.5%
Rack, isolation: 6%
Network: 1%
Library management: 3.2%
With my upcoming speakers (this then being my end game):
Source (2x) 26.3%
Pre + phono pre: 21.2%
Power amp: 12.3%
Speakers: 18.5%
Signal cables: 6.8%
Power cables: 6.3%
Rack, isolation: 5.1%
Network: 0.8%
Library management: 2.71%
Sources 39.2%
Pre (inc. phono & activeXO) 33.9%
Power 15.2%
Speaker 5.4%
Cables 6.7%
Support 2.3%
Most of this system (active SBLs) was bought s/h (in fact everything other than the Sondek-Zeta-AT cartridge), but I find it interesting that Iāve spent more on interconnects & spkr cable that I did on the Sibbles.
Power, cables etc. and local music stuff not included but would be relatively quite significant - I am even somewhat reluctant to calculate these but wouldnāt change them.
Ironically, my lowest priced part/component, the amp, is probably the most valuable to me - although Iāve had and heard a few, I am virtually unable to think of a replacement that I would like as much in the room and setup (different good yes). When a system is already there and starts working as one, especially when mixing hifi of different generations, prices of individual components become less relevant. This thread was provoking and I did this, although I do recommend an open mind to matching and I can see how on cost basis alone my % allocation may not make much sense in some hifi books.
This is really difficult with DIY speakers. The parts alone cost more than my Atom. If I had to buy something of the equivalent then the closest commercially available speaker of similar construction is the vandersteen Quattro wood ct @ $23000 AUD. With the atom @ $5000AUD.
So current system is hypothetically:
Source/pre/amp - 17.5%
Speakers - 82.5% (speakers also contain 250w of amplification)
Yes, I realised I overspent on cables but do not have regrets owning them. I am more of a cable guy and donāt usually hold back when it comes to cabling, especially when I have settled down with the equipment or main components and do not have any urge to replace them with anything else. The cables are part of the system anyway and they have a place, in my book.
Wise words. Provided you are happy with your system, the amount spent on each component doesnāt matter a row of beans. Its the synergy between the components which matters. Thats where naim scores as (with a few exceptions) as you move up the chain the magic is not lost but amplified (excuse the pun )!
At list though, with a bit for cabinet material, is it about 60:40 speakers to source/amp?
I think the value from DIY kits is astonishing, and putting both numbers down might make a few more folks consider it (Iām still browsing the TG site making plans )