The replacement cost of my hifi is now what I paid for my first house
Oopsā¦
Support/cables. 30%
Amp. 28%
Source. 25%
Speakers. 17%
Source, including power supplies. 24%
Pre/power. 35%
Speakers. 20%
Fraim. 6%
Cables, switches etc. 15%
Quick edit needed as I had completely overlooked those pesky Powerlines.
Not sure about patterns, Iām fairly surprised how many have a single source cf. how many have multiple. Iāve spent c. 1/3 on source, but have that between 3 sources! Clearly I need to upgrade my sources to keep the balance right. Then upgrade my amp accordingly. Thenā¦ ohā¦
Mine is about 8 times the cost of my first house
Sources (TT & streamer): 50%
Amplification: 29%
Speakers: 6%
Accessories (stands, cables, switch): 15%
Cost of replacing the above would be approximately a third of the cost of replacing the vinyl collection. Time to check the insurance policyā¦
Frightening
Houses were cheap in the mid 80s
Bought my first house in 1990 just before a property crash. Fortunately I bought my second just before a property boom - swings and roundabouts!
Thatās the best thing about percentages, they donāt betray the spend!
We regularly pass our first flat together in the centre of Edinburgh and how I wished we could have kept it. I could buy my system three times over on the uplift in value over the last 30 years.
G
If only is a much used phrase in the English language!!
Thatās why I chose % rather than cost. That and the comparability.
G
Iām a bit surprised at the relatively low percentage allocated to speakers. I donāt know how many contributors here are American, but I think our US cousins are more speaker-biased than the source-biased UK.
Indeed, if only Iād stayed in my first hovel I would have been a rich man today, after living in a hovel for the last 40 years.
Source 8% (NDX, no PS)
Pre 26% (NAC52)
Power 48% (NAP500)
Speakers 18% (S600)
But source, pre and speakers are no longer available, so hard to be accurate.
Hmm - my first house was Ā£1300.00, second was Ā£11,000, third I canāt remember - about Ā£25000 I think, 4th I canāt remember (Ā£35000?), 5th was Ā£60,000 and current was Ā£242,000.
In my 1st house I had mostly home-made equipment, speakers about Ā£45.00, amplification probably about Ā£50.00, source maybe Ā£20 to Ā£30 - but in those days I had more sources than now (TT, Cassette, Radio and, later, R2R). So, say, 1:13, roughly. Second house had, eventually, Naim kit. NAP22,NAC120 and Naim 702 or something, say about Ā£400, plus Pioneer PL12D, two R2R tape decks, NAD tuner - say about Ā£200. So a ratio of 3:55 or 1:17 approx. I had much the same kit in the third house, so ratio about 1:40. 4th house, towards the end of my time there, was NAC52, active SBLs with 135s, sources much the same except for a Rega Planar 3. I think the Naim kit cost about Ā£6000 when I bought it second hand, so I guess a retail price would be about Ā£12000. Rega was - what? a coupla hundred? The house sold for about Ā£65000, so letās say a much more reasonable 1:5 (really? that seems highā¦). Current system retail should be about Ā£46000, probably a little more. Hard to know what the value of the house is now - Zoopla has a very over-optimistic valuation of Ā£790,000 but I think that is way over the price. But taking that price the ratio is 1:17, so back to where I was with the second house.
An interesting exercise - though I suppose otherwise quite meaningless.
Yeah - I had a flat in Edinburgh - though not near the centre; Springwell Place on Dalry Road. Bought for Ā£1300, sold for Ā£2300 IIRC. Value now - Ā£150,000. Makes me weep. I could easily have kept the flat, rented it outā¦
Zoopla valuations are pure fiction, worked out on the back of an envelope I think.
If you assume the preamp is a kind of bolt-on to the source, as I do, thatās the classic source first hierarchy that I have followed - for the musical enjoyment, not the vogueishness.
Mine (rounded):
Source: 31%
Pre: 23%
Power: 23%
Speakers: 10%
Cables: 9%
Support 4%
Sounds lovely.
Cost of system today is approximately 5.5 times what I paid for my first house in 1981. Or approximately double what we paid in 1993 for the house we now live in. Looks scary but isnāt really. Our house is now worth more than we could comfortably afford to pay a mortgage on - now that is scary.