DSP chips are dedicated hardware that can do this without (hardly) any strain, they won’t need to be working hard.
Roon however will have to do DSP in software which will strain the device significantly more, and it will likely also be more lossy than a hardware DSP solution. Any DSP will have an effect on audio quality, but the Roon approach certainly not less than the hardware approach, and potentially more.
The 272 has a DSP chip built in, but it’s not user adjustable:
I agree. There are several headphone DSP presets built into Roon, but for Audeze headphones only if I am correct. For room correction Roon is perfectly usable. I am running a so called convolution filter myself in Roon with very good results. I use a Mac Mini as Roon server, but others have reported good results running Roon on their NAS device.
AutoEq available on GitHub provide a wealth of DSP settings and filterz for headphones that have been measured to different standards. All these can be used in any app that has parametic EQ or you can download the filters to use in a convolution engine such as Roon or Hqplayer. I have several and use them but not all the time. Roon gives my easy access to switch them on and off on any given device I am using the headphones on.
I’m still surprised that Focal hasn’t petitioned Roon to include their DSP filters/presets like Audeze has. I always thought this was a nice selling point for Audeze
I guess Franco US relatations are not what they should be.
Another review in - including using Atom HE as a pre-amp…
Yet another piece of WHF idiosyncrasy, IMO. They compare the Headphone edition with the original Atom with a range of headphones, presumably using the headphone output of the original and find the Atom HE outperforms the original. Quelle surprise, the headphone output of my Atom is hardly its most stellar feature. Or are they comparing it with Atom + speakers, in which case how to make that a fair and reasonably objective comparison?
I’m still hoping for a “proper” review of Atom HE + active speakers – I might even be in that market myself.
Roger
Yes, they compare Atom HE vs Atom for headphone listening - an ideal comparison for someone trying to understand the difference between the two systems.
If you read again, you’ll see they also compare Atom HE vs Atom when used as a streaming pre-amp into their reference power amp and speakers. That clearly shows the uplift in pre-amp performance the new design offers - whether you’re using it with active speakers or with power amp/speakers.
Well, actually I did read that, but found it hard to take seriously the idea that there will be lots of people wanting to feed the Atom HE into a £36k amplifier and £10k speakers. Perhaps they are contemplating an entry into the “ultimate mullet” competition. 
Had the HE version been available when I got my Atom last year I’d have been very tempted to combine it with something like Acoustic Every AE1s for my office system. I’d probably have gone on to buy a good set of phones, Focal even. A different use case, of course, but IMO more useful to a potential purchaser than WHF’s.
Roger
If you scroll up a bit to post 812, you’ll see i’ve also linked (several times, in fact) to an eCoustics review of the Atom HE with the AE1s.
I found the review reassuring. I have an Atom HE on order and will use it connected to a NAP250, which I hope will be better than my current set up (UQ2, nDAC, SN1, HC), with less boxes. We’ll see how that sounds, but I also got the HE for its headphone capabilities.
Could you report your finding later about this use case please? I’m also interested in the same configuration as yours.
Thank you in advance/Bandit
will do
Yes I did read that review a little time ago. It was why I would have considered AtomHE/AE1 when I was in the market. My point was simply that I just find WHF’s reviewing methodology does not inspire me with confidence in their judgements and putting Atom in front of £35,000+ of gear was an example of why. Probably I’m alone in my view of WHF, so time to wrap up this thread diversion I think and get back to enjoying our various Atoms.
Roger
That’s an interesting change. I enjoyed 272/XPSDR/250DR for several years and would also be interested in your findings. Are you keeping your current setup for comparison?
Roger
Roger, My aim was to reduce the number of boxes, whilst upgrading sound quality. I was quite taken by the introduction Clare provided for the new HE - work done on the pre-amp stage. I also talked with Naim support, who are sure I will see an upgrade to my current system and confirming they have already tried out the HE with a NAP250 to good effect. We’ll see. I will be keeping my current system, though am not sure if I’ll do a detailed side by side comparison.
I will be keeping a lookout for the N-272 v2 and may get that as well, re-allocating the HE elsewhere in the house or keeping it just as a headphone amp.
Rhod
How will you connect the two? I believe that the HE has dual XLR outputs while the 250DR has a single XLR input.
I’ve had a custom cable made connecting the 2 XLR to the single NAP250 input. I may also get one connecting RCA to NAP250 for comparison purposes.
I look forward to your findings - I also have a 260DR which I will try with the Atom HE- there is a waiting list now, Have you gone for a reasonably priced cable. Do you mind saying your source? I used to use Dave at Flashback but sadly he died recently and the business closed
I guess I could just use an XLR Y adaptor.
