Well, thatās a few days trialling the G3 with the sparkly undercarriage, ( ), and I canāt really nail down exactly what itās doing, other than to say that instruments sound more ārealā, if that makes any sense.
So, only a couple of years late to the party, Iām happy to announce that it will be remaining, Chez Dave. ā¦ ā¦ ā¦ oh, and @Gazza, Iāve cancelled the Muso order!
Yes it is difficult to put a finger on the effect of the G3 sparkly bottom, but i liked it too. Good to know those ears are OK, they take a bashingš
No I havenāt tried the 300 with the 252. Iām quite settled on the 252/250 configuration for my room and speakers and really want to stay at 5 boxes on a single Fraim. Though it would be nice to try one out as a comparison.
The nSub doesnāt release the nSats from anything - they work just as the did before. The sub simply fills in below whatever frequency you set. The key seems to be to set the sub at the lowest crossover frequency you can get away with. Low bass isnāt directional so the lower you have it the easier it is to integrate, or thatās what I found anyway. When I had mine it was on the back wall to the left of the sofa; youād never have known that the bass wasnāt coming from the main speakers. When you get it integrated it works so well.
Entreq Olympus Infinity RG45 ethernet cable connected to my Olympus Ten ground box used between switch and streamer. Great upgrade Miles ahead of my prior cables such as Chord c-stream, Shunyata venom, BJC, Chord shawline etc.
Before buying the G3, I tried both it and the Lite. I compared both to plugging two items directly in to the wall socket. The G3 made a very worthwhile improvement, whereas the Lite made no difference whatsoever.