The phono stage looks very appealing to me and could well end up in my system. As for the 332/333/350, whilst appealing, it is beyond what I would want to spend on a system. I will remain very happy with my 222/300 and replace my 250DR with the NC250 early next year.
3 Likes
The 350 looks interesting might get some prices and consider my options.
1 Like
When I wake up in morning this thread will be 4,000 responses
Good evening 
2 Likes
Anyone owning a new NAP250 whoās feeling nostalgic can just borrow a dymo and relabel the inputs and outputs 
No transformer hum also with my 222/300/250.
1 Like
No Pete not 350 / think front end source first
Havenāt you learnt anything on your long naim journey 
1 Like
I like the implementation of XLR balanced everything and I like the 350 mono blocks. But NAIM has priced itself out of my attainment at this point. Curious to see the New Classic Supernait as thatās the only product I might be able to afford.
Iād love for anyone here to directly compare NAP 350 (X2) with Schiit Tyr (X2) and write a detailed, fair comparison review.
3 Likes
Hi @TOBYJUG,
ā¦There will be some beautiful official under the bonnet inside shots from our Marketing team. In the meantime, hereās some blurry iPhone photos straight from the R&D workbench.
Please bear in mind these are prototypes and do have modifications. They will have been taken apart many times and their condition shows this. Production units are fanatically built.
NAC 332
Note: The top input selecting PCB obscures the main lower PCB.
NSS 333
NAP 350
Note: The actual power amp PCB with dual sets of NA009 power transistors and DR regs with dual NA009 are hidden under the top PCB (balanced input circuits, their DR PSUs and music sensing).
Best
Steve
42 Likes
Thatās obvious if I had Iād be ignoring these new releases.
The 222 and 333 use the backend of the PCM1971A, just the DAC array part.
When used with the SHARC DSP for the integer oversampling we found the 1791 to sound better than the 1792.
19 Likes
Lovely work! Hatās off to you. I look forward to hearing more about the how and why and the soundā¦
Thatās ok Vyvyan 
1 Like
Bump just in case Iām in an ignore list
Original XPS or XPS2/XPS DR?
XPS2 non DR Richard
A couple of queries please - 552 to 350:
Is this possible and if so, which cables are required?
Are there any potential downsides to this pairing?
Thanks
Graeme
This is great news. I will build a new system around a 252DR I have kept after upgrading to a 552.
I will probably go for a 333 and a new 250. The 350 is above what I want to achieve.
This should make a fantastic, up to date, system.
2 Likes
Iād expect it will be like the 222 streamer/pre-amp then and be possible via the special Burndy.
1 Like
Yes, should be possible using the same special single ended DIN to balanced XLR cables as were made available for the NC NAP250.
2 Likes
Iām more interested in the NSS333. That way I can keep my amps recently serviced and upgrade to a NPX300 later, the advantage being I already have a serviced XPS2 non DR. The upgrade of the NSC222 with the power supply NPX300 was very worthwhile when I demoed this in Karlsruhe. If thatās the case then well done with a thoughtful transition from the old classic.
Something that I am very keen to demo. Without power supply, with XPS2 and then with NPX300
3 Likes